Score One for Plonk



In an intriguing article in The New York Times, Julia Moskin puts to the test that often-repeated kitchen admonition "only cook with wine you’d drink"—and thoroughly debunks it.

In the most startling passage, she describes how she made three versions of the classic Italian dish risotto al Barolo: one with a 2000 Barolo ($69.95), one with a 2005 dolcetto d’ Alba ($22.95), and one with a Charles Shaw cabernet sauvignon—yep, Two-Buck Chuck. You may have guessed where I’m headed with this. Indeed, the seven-person Times tasting panel deemed the Two-Buck Chuck version the best, noting that the wine’s fruit "‘stood up well to the cheese’ and made the dish rounder." Their comments on the Barolo version included "least flavorful," "sharp edges," and "sour."

But I think I’ll stick with the sort of wine I’ve always cooked with—the inexpensive ($10 range) but still decent, bottle. Why? Because at our house, what doesn’t make it into the pot goes directly into our glasses.

Category: Random Stuff
Technorati Tags:

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 3/22/2007 8:03 AM Lisa (Homesick Texan) wrote:
    I agree, I always get a low-range but decent tasting wine for cooking just because I know that if it doesn't get used up we'll be drinking it.
    Reply to this
    1. 3/22/2007 8:17 PM Sarah Kiino wrote:
      Hi Lisa--yeah, totally. I think drinking a glass while cooking is part of the fun!
      Reply to this
  • 3/25/2007 6:16 AM Yvo wrote:
    Haha, nice. What a waste as well. I find more expensive wines don't do well with me anyway (the "better" someone says a wine is, the more it tastes like "the dirt the grapes grew in" apparently... which to me, means just tasting like dirt.). I've also always found it odd that I don't like cooking with wine 90% of the time but like cooking with beer when I don't drink beer, like ever. Weird. Great article
    Reply to this
    1. 3/27/2007 11:00 PM Sarah Kiino wrote:
      Hi Yvonne--welcome back! Looking forward to reading about your trip. Beer's great for cooking, too! So I wonder if they'll find Milwaukee's Best is better for cooking than microbrews . . .
      Reply to this
  • 3/29/2007 4:48 PM vanessa wrote:
    a $10 bottle is about right for me. Heck, I'd probably be happy with a $3 bottle too.
    Reply to this
    1. 3/30/2007 2:37 PM Sarah Kiino wrote:
      Hey Vanessa! Yep, there are so many choices out there for well under $10 . . . and some of them are pretty decent, too.
      Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.